Bellow is a list of publications made by researchers participating in the ASPIC project. Click over the column name to sort the list by that column.

No Title  Author(s) Published in Year
1


 
A Denotational Semantics for Deliberation Dialogues

   
Peter McBurney, Simon Parsons


 
Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS-2004). New York City, NY, USA 2004


 
2



 
A Dialogue Game Protocol for Multi-Agent Argument over Proposals for Action

   
Katie Atkinson, Trevor Bench-Capon, Peter McBurney


 
First International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (ArgMAS 2004), AAMAS 2004, New York, NY, USA
 
2004



 
3 A free-format dialogue protocol for multi-party inquiry

   
Gerard Vreeswijk, Joris Hulstrin In Proc. of the Eighth Int. Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue (Catalog '04) (pp. 273-279) 2004
4



 
A study of accrual of arguments, with applications to evidential reasoning

   
Henry Prakken



 
Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Bologna, 2005. New York: ACM Press

 
2005



 
5




 
An Argumentation Framework for Merging Conflicting Knowledge Bases: The Prioritized Case

   
Leila Amgoud, Souhila Kaci




 
8th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty, ECSQARU' 2005, Barcelona, pp. 527-538, LNCS

 
2005




 
6



 
An argumentation-based approach to multiple criteria decision

   
Henri Prade, Leila Amgoud, Jean-Franc-Bonnefon


 
8th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty, ECSQARU' 2005, Barcelona

 
2005



 
7


 
Arguing the discard of organs in CARREL

   
U. Cortes, P. Tolchinsky, J.C. Nieves, F. Caballero, A. Lopez-Navidad XIII Winter Course on Ambient Intelligence in Medicine CATAI 2005, pages 93-105. 2005
 
2005


 
8


 
Argumentation as a new approach in GAME AI

   
Hendric.H.Heiner, Alla Morozova, Yuri Salop

 
AIIDE05


 
2005


 
9


 
Argumentation Schemes and Burden of Proof

   
Henry Prakken, Chris Reed, Douglas Walton

 
Working Notes of the 4th International Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument (CMNA2004)
 
2004


 
10


 
Argumentation-based negotiation    

   
Peter McBurney, Simon Parsons, Liz Sonenberg, IyadRahwan, Sarvapali.d.Ramchurn, Nicholas R. Jennings The Knowledge Engineering Review, Vol. 18:4, 343–375 Cambridge University PressDOI: 10.1017/S0269888904000098 Printed in the United Kingdom 2004


 
11


 
ASPIC ANNUAL PUBLIC REPORT 2004

   
ASPIC


 
ASPIC


 
2004


 
12




 
D1.1 - Review on Argumentation Technology: State of the Art, technical and user requirements

   
ASPIC




 
ASPIC




 
2004




 
13


 
D2.1 - Theoretical framework for argumentation

  
ASPIC


 
ASPIC


 
2004


 
14


 
D7.2 - Updated Project Fact Sheet

   
ASPIC


 
ASPIC


 
2004


 
15

 
D7.3 Project Presentation

   
ASPIC

 
ASPIC

 
2004

 
16


 
Developing Argumentation Positions

   
Trevor Bench-Capon, Paul E. Dunne


 
4th Workshop on Computer Models of Natural Argument, Valencia, 23rd-24th August 2004

 
2004


 
17


 
Dialogues about the burden of proof

   
Henry Prakken, C. Reed, D.N. Walton

 
Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Bologna, 2005. New York:ACM Press
 
2005


 
18

 
Dialogues and HY-arguments

  
Martin Caminada

 
Proceedings of the Tenth International Workshop on No monotonic Reasoning, Whistler, Canada, 2004. 2004

 
19


 
Flexible querying with argued answers

  
Henri Prade, Leila Amgoud, Manuel Serrut

 
The IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE 2005), Reno, Nevada

 
2004


 
20


 
Justifying Practical Reasoning


  
Katie Atkinson, Trevor Bench-Capon, Peter McBurney

 
Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument (CMNA 2004), pp. 87-90.  ECAI 2004, Valencia, Spain 2004


 
21


 
Locutions for argumentation in agent interaction protocols

   
Peter McBurney Simon Parsons


 
3rd International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents

 
2004


 
22



 
On Sceptical Versus Credulous Acceptance for Abstract Argument Systems

   
Sylvie Doutre, Jerome Mengin



 
9th European conference on logics in artificial intelligence (jelia 2004), Lisbon


 
2004



 
23



 
On the bipolarity in argumentation frameworks

   
L. Amgoud, C. Cayrol,M.C. Lagasquie-Schiex


 
10th NMR workshop (Non-Monotonic Reasoning), Uncertainty Frameworks sub workshop, Whistler, BC, Canada

 
2004



 
24



 
On the generation of bipolar goals in argumentation-based negotiation

  
Leila Amgoud, Souhila Kaci

 
In the proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agents Systems (ArgMAS 2004) , New York, USA 2004



 
25



 
On the search of a consensus between autonomous agents

  
Henri Prade, Leila Amgoud, Sihem Belabbes
 
Proc. of the International Conference in Advances in Intelligent Systems - Theory and Applications (AISTA'04), Luxembourg 2004



 
26



 
On the use of an ATMS for handling conflicting desires

  
Leila Amgoud, Claudette Cayrol 9th International Conference on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, KR' 2004, Whistler, Canada, pp. 194-201, AAAI Press 2004
27




 
Outline of a multi-agent system for regulated information exchange in crime investigations

  
P. Dijkstra, F.J. Bex, H. Prakken, C.N.J. De Vey, Mestdagh



 
Proceedings of the ICAIL-05 workshop on Argumentation in A.I. and Law, Bologna, 2005



 
2005




 
28



 
Reaching agreement through argumentation: A possibilistic approach

   
Henri Prade, Leila Amgoud



 
Proc. of the 9th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR'04), Whistler, BC, Canada

 
2004



 
29



 
Reinterpreting arguments in dialogue: an application to evidential reasoning
 
  
Henry Prakken, Floris Bex



 
In T.F. Gordon (ed.), Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2004: The Seventeenth Annual Conference. Amsterdam etc, IOS Press (2004), 119-129
 
2004



 
30



 
Threats, rewards and explanatory arguments: generation and evaluation

  
Henri Prade,Leila Amgoud



 
Proc. of the 16th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI'04), Valencia, Spain

 
2004



 
31



 
Using arguments for making decisions: A possibilistic logic approach

   
Henri Prade, Leila Amgoud



 
Proceeding of the 20th Conference of Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI'04), Banff, Canada, pp. 10-17, AUAI Press

 
2004



 
32


 
Argumentation


   
T.J.M. Bench-Capon, H. Prakken


 
Information Technology Lawyers: Advanced technology in the legal domain, from challenges to daily routine. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 2005, 61-80 2005


 
33



 
Computational models, argumentation theories and legal practice

  
T.J.M. Bench-Capon, J.B. Freeman, H. Hohmann and H. Prakken


 
Argumentation Machines. New Frontiers in Argument and Computation. Kluwer Argumentation Library, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston/Dordrecht/London 2004, 85-120 2004



 
34



 
A Guardian Agent Approach to Safety in Medical Multi-agent Systems

   
S.Modgil and J.Fox



 
Proc. of the First International Workshop on Safety and Security in Multi-Agent Systems (SAEMAS'04 at AAMAS 2004),New York, July, 2004
 
2004



 
35



 
Nested Argumentation and its Application to Decision Making over Actions

  
S. Modgil



 
Proc. Second International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (ArgMAS 2005 at AAMAS 2005), Utrecht, Netherlands, July, 2004
 
2004



 
36




 
Towards Formalising Agent Argumentation over the Viability of Human Organs for Transplantation

  
Sanjay Modgil, Pancho Tolchinsky, Ulises Cortes



 
Proc. MICAI 2005: Advances in Artificial Intelligence: 4th Mexican International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Monterrey, Mexico, November 14-18, 2005,Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 3789, Nov 2005 2005




 
37





 
Argument Schemes and Critical Questions for Heterogeneous Agents to Argue Over the Viability of a Human Organ

   
P. Tolchinsky, S. Modgil, U. Cortes





 
Accepted for publication in Argumentation for Consumers of Healthcare - AAAI 2006 Spring Symposia Stanford University, Stan ford, California, March 27-29, 2006


 
2006





 
38


 
Towards a general model for argumentation services

  
John Fox, Liz Black, David Glasspool, Sanjay Modgil, Ayelet Oettinger, Vivek Patkar, Matt Williams Accepted for publication in Argumentation for Consumers of Healthcare - AAAI 2006 Spring Symposia
 
2006


 
39


 
Argumentation in AI and Law (no link)

   
Paul E. Dunne and Trevor Bench-Capon

 
IAAIL Workshop series 2, Wolff Publishers, Nijmegan, 2005

 
2005


 
40
 
Persuasion and Value in Legal Argument

   
T.Bench-Capon, K. Atkinson, A Chorley Journal of Logic and Computation 15:1075-97
 
2005
 
41


 
Computational Representation of Practical Argument (no link)

   
K. Atkinson, T. Bench-Capon and P. McBurney

 
Accepted for publication to appear. W. van der Hoek (editor): Knowledge, Rationality and Action, part of the Synthese journal.  In press 2005


 
42


 
Generating intentions through argumentation

  
Katie Atkinson, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Peter McBurney

 
AAMAS 2005: 1261-1262


 
2005


 
43



 
Determining Preferences through Argumentation (no link)

   
S. Doutre, T.J.M. Bench-Capon and P. E. Dunne


 
Proc. AI*IA'05, Milan, September 2005, LNAI 3673, Springer-Verlag, pages 98--109


 
2005